Usability Notes - by Chris Baker

Notes on usability and related things by a project manager who manages electronic publishing projects.

About

My Photo

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Recent Posts

    • web usage statistics, and Dr Seuss
    • Facebook - the problem of the customer being the product
    • The Prioritizing Grid - as a project tool
    • Why you might not want to "Friend" me on Facebook
    • Google, Facebook, the mixed blessings of better-organized data
    • Pet hates - automated jollity
    • Nice usability ideas - Glooo contact form
    • Usability pet hates - secret password rules
    • Sorry, no hard and fast rules in UX
    • How long will users stay on your web page?

    Most popular posts

    • kanban
    • "Oh, you just click the TV?" The journey of a metaphor
    • Security question difficulties
    • The NLM DTD
    • Poka-yoke
    • web colours
    • Requirements analysis
    • Shopping cart abaondonment benchmarks

    ROI of Social Media Marketing: on average, nearly breaking even

    Marketing Sherpa have just published their 2011 Social Marketing Benchmark Report.  There's an interesting graph in the promotional email about this report, showing the ROI that marketers are reporting, in a survey of 3,342 responses. The mode is a 95% ROI (25% of respondents) but about 30% of respondents said they were making a profit (i.e. ROI more than 100%). Forty-three percent were not yet in happy street, making an ROI of 50% or less.

    Social Media return on ROI

     

    There are some more samples and stats (and a link to buy the full report) on MarketingSherpa's site

    April 13, 2011 in e-marketing and e-commerce, social media | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

    | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |

    What my peeps tweet

    A friend who is a Sales Director recently asked me what I got from using Twitter. He associated it with people doing short rambles about inconsequential things (as in "I am eating a tuna sandwich.") Trying to sum up, I said something like - "I use it to keep very loosely associated with people who might be useful to me". Something, as a salesman, he immediately saw was worthwhile. Like me, before I used twitter, he'd thought about the broadcasting, rather than the receiving aspect of it.

    Partly because of thinking about social media as being so much to do with the weak tie (see my previous post) I decided to do a quick  bit of analysis on what comes into my twitter feed. First a word of explanation for those not familiar with Twitter. art of setting up and running a Twitter account is to choose other Twitter users to "Follow". No one can make you follow anyone - you pick people/organizations that seem likely to say something interesting, amusing or otherwise worthwhile. It is still considered polite to follow someone back if they follow you, but this is breaking down now that some twitter accounts are run for the purpose of spamming. So I think many users now do what I do - check on the content someone is producing and decide whether to follow them based on that. When you follow people, their messages ("tweets") become visible to you when you look at your Twitter account.

    My Twitter network is very much work-focused. I do follow a couple of light relief items (e.g. The Onion), but mostly I'm in search of people discussing publishing, programming, project management, usability etc.

    At present, I follow 162 twitter accounts. This breaks down as follows:

      Twitter follow analysis

    • 14% are people or organizations I know personally (typically I have worked with them in the past or am doing that now).
    • 28% are people or organizations I haven't worked with, but would know about if it were not for Twitter
    • But the majority, 57%, are people or organizations that I would have no contact with if it were not for Twitter.

    I also did a quick analysis of the subject matter these accounts tweeted about (I looked at 75 tweets, all from today):

    Tweet subject

    • 69% were work-related items - commonly links to reading material or other material of interest (often news items). Also included here are promotional items about people's new ventures, services or products.
    • 20% were not work related, e.g. general news, humour, opinion about general matters
    • 11% were "tuna sandwich" items - mundane information about the everyday things people were doing or thinking right now

    So, as I suspected, what I am mostly getting is news and suggestions for background reading from people who otherwise would  not be able to send me that information. This is, of course, in the end, configurable by me - I am at liberty to follow a mass of "tuna sandwich" tweeters if I wish. Moreover, the "tuna sandwiches" are not all wasted bandwidth - sometimes someone describes an interest that is useful matter for small-talk if we meet, or otherwise interesting or amusing.

     

     

     

     

     

    October 15, 2010 in social media | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

    | Digg This | Save to del.icio.us |

    google box

    • google box
      Google

      all Google
      this blog only

    Adsense

    Subscribe in a reader
    Subscribe to Usability Notes - by Chris Baker by Email

    Archives

    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • September 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011

    More...

    Categories

    • Accessibility
    • Announcements
    • Books
    • Case Studies
    • Current Affairs
    • Customer behaviour
    • e-marketing and e-commerce
    • Email marketing
    • Games usability
    • ideas parking space
    • mobile
    • My usability experiences
    • Nice usability ideas
    • Pet hates
    • project management
    • Publishing
    • requirements analysis
    • Soapbox
    • social media
    • statistics and data
    • Tools
    • Usability and children
    • usage statistics
    • Useful usability resources
    • Web/Tech
    • Weblogs
    • website testing
    • Weird user interfaces
    • writing about others' writings
    • XML
    • Usability Notes - by Chris Baker
    • Powered by TypePad